|
LESSONS FROM RECENT SCHOOL BUDGET AND
BOARD ELECTIONS
On
April 15, the first school elections were held since passage
of the new school funding formula. Despite the radical changes
introduced by the formula, one number remained the same
voter turnout. Only about 14% of registered voters came out
to elect school board members and say yea or nay to proposed
school budgets for academic year 2008-9. The 14% figure is
slightly higher than last years number.
Over 90% of New Jersey school districts held
elections on April 15. Residents in Type II districts with
elected school boards voted, while those in Type I districts
with appointed school boards did not. Elections were held
in 549 districts, and 1,594 school board seats were filled.
"In many cases, low voter turnout means
an absence of local accountability," said Jerome Harris,
Chair of the New Jersey Black Issues Convention, a founding
member of OC/OS.
"Not only do local residents need to
vote on school budgets and school leadership, they need to
become involved in the process," he added. "We cant
wait until next April. The time is now to become familiar
with school budgets, press for spending on programs that work
for all children and especially those most at risk, and consider
running competent, dedicated individuals for school board
positions."
The statewide rate at which 2008-9 school
budgets were approved was fairly high at almost 74%. That
figure did not deviate much from the 2007 rate of 78% but
was a significant increase over the 2006 figure of 52%. In
2007, State aid increased to many districts that had experienced
flat funding for five years.
In 2008, the school funding landscape changed
with passage of the School Funding Reform Act of 2008 (SFRA).
With the promise of over $800 million in "adjustment
aid" to school districts over and above State aid included
in the new formula, some districts were able to propose lower
property tax increases than they had in some years. But Governor
Corzines budget must pass the Legislature before districts
can be sure that they will receive adjustment aid this year.
And there is no guarantee that this additional, non-formula
aid will continue into the following budget year and beyond.
Neither adjustment aid nor increased formula
aid to some districts could convince voters to approve a majority
of "second questions" on April 15. Only 12% of 33
separate ballot questions were approved. Even the number of
these second questions specific spending proposals
that, if passed, would permit a district to exceed the 4%
State-imposed cap on budget increases was much lower
than last years total of 87. The decrease can be attributed
to a new law requiring 60%, rather than a simple majority,
for their approval.
Prepared: May 13, 2008
|